🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios launched a fresh game mode titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode mirrors the regular Breakthrough setup but features several key adjustments:

• Every squad has only eight human participants, with the remaining made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities done by real players grant full XP, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Only two maps are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

In short, the playlist lives up to its title: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume there's nothing wrong, since it gives additional choices for gamers looking for alternative methods to enjoy the title. However, gaming history has shown one thing, it is that you can't please everyone. In other words, many BF6 players are upset.

Player Reactions: From Fury to Praise

"People want real players. Don't repeat the errors of your competitors," states a response to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing idea," comments another. At the same time, in community forums, one user notes, "It's unclear where we are going with this game," while another details everything they consider to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this bot mode."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players explaining how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," reads a forum post. "The community doesn't understand that there are gamers who actually go outside and don't play this game all the time. Let them find a middle ground," adds another. One reply on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is perfect for me," while someone else applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Concerns and Player Feedback

All that said, players have constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it could increase wait times more extended for different playlists due to the sheer number of playlists currently available. Similarly, certain regions already encounter AI-filled matches in the current modes. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a required amount of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, one of the biggest complaints is that Battlefield Portal was meant to offer complete rewards, including AI matches, but that was removed when they attempted to remove bot farms from the mode. Thus this new playlist feels like the player base compromising halfway, as per forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the developers "making a mistake significantly, I experienced great enjoyment in the initial release, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something to date with the latest installment, it's that they're listening and acting on player input. Tasks being too difficult got fixed rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data shows this new playlist isn't performing to their standards, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.